What must be conducted for applications that have deficiencies regarding alleged misconduct?

An investigation must be conducted for applications that have deficiencies regarding alleged misconduct because this process is essential for determining the validity of the allegations and ensuring that all claims are thoroughly examined. An investigation allows for the gathering of evidence, interviewing relevant parties, and compiling facts necessary to arrive at a fair and informed conclusion. This step is critical in maintaining ethical standards and accountability in any professional setting, especially in legal fields where integrity is paramount. Without an investigation, there would be no formal mechanism to address and resolve concerns, leaving potential misconduct unchecked.

Other options may play a role in the broader procedure of reviewing applications, but they do not replace the necessity of conducting a thorough investigation. For instance, while a follow-up interview might provide additional information, it doesn't systematically address or validate the misconduct claims. A detailed report would be the result of an investigation, summarizing the findings, and a background check could provide relevant historical context, but again, these actions do not directly address the issue of deficiencies due to alleged misconduct without first having a comprehensive investigation in place.