What proof must an applicant provide if they engaged in the profession in another jurisdiction while inactive?

The correct answer is appropriate because, when an applicant has engaged in the profession in another jurisdiction while maintaining an inactive status, they must demonstrate their professional activity and good standing in that prior location. This typically involves providing proof of practice, which can include records of services rendered or other documentation that confirms active engagement in legal document preparation. Additionally, affidavits affirming no disciplinary actions show that the individual has maintained a professional standard without any violations or infractions that would affect their ability to practice.

The requirement for affidavits is significant; it allows for verification that the applicant has operated ethically and within the rules that govern the profession in that jurisdiction. This protects consumers and reinforces the integrity of those entering the field in Arizona after having practiced elsewhere.

The other options, while they may represent important aspects of professional practice, do not directly address the need to prove prior engagement in the profession and absence of disciplinary issues. Continuing education hours are typically relevant for maintaining active status but do not serve as proof of past practice in an inactive capacity. Employment records may not reflect the applicant's compliance with professional standards or their lack of disciplinary actions. Proof of residency is tangential at best and does not relate directly to the applicant's professional qualifications or conduct in the practice of legal