Who holds the burden of proof at the hearing for denial of renewal?

In the context of a hearing for denial of renewal, the applicant is responsible for the burden of proof. This means that the applicant must provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate why their renewal should be granted despite any objections or findings that may suggest otherwise.

The rationale behind placing the burden of proof on the applicant is rooted in the fundamental legal principle that someone seeking a benefit, such as a license renewal, must prove their eligibility for that benefit. In this scenario, if the renewal is being challenged or denied, it is the applicant's responsibility to counter the arguments or evidence that led to the denial effectively.

By understanding that the applicant holds this burden, it emphasizes the proactive role they must take in the hearing process. They must come prepared with relevant evidence, records, or testimonies that can support their position and address any issues that have arisen during the review of their renewal application. This ensures a fair process where the applicant actively engages in establishing their qualification for the renewal they seek.